Provider profile
Roto-Rooter Plumbing & Water Cleanup
Provider snapshot
What this listing says
Philadelphia homeowners dealing with water damage that led to mold, who want one company to handle plumbing repair, water extraction, and mold cleanup without coordinating multiple contractors.
Best for
- Philadelphia and Montgomery/Bucks County homeowners who need emergency water damage restoration and mold cleanup from the same company that fixes the plumbing problem.
- After-hours emergencies where you need someone on-site within hours — Roto-Rooter dispatches 24/7 and multiple reviewers confirm same-day arrival on evenings and weekends.
- Insurance-covered water damage or mold jobs where you want the restoration company to handle documentation and bill your carrier directly.
- Commercial properties — offices, retail, and multi-unit buildings — that need scalable water damage response with minimal downtime.
- Homeowners with older Philadelphia row houses experiencing basement flooding, sewer backups, or frozen pipe damage who need both the plumbing fix and the water cleanup.
About this company
Roto-Rooter in Philadelphia is a national franchise operation based at 3515 Frankford Ave, managed by John McCreery. Their primary identity is plumbing and drain cleaning, but the Philadelphia branch runs a full water damage restoration and mold remediation division alongside the plumbing side. They handle both residential and commercial work across Philadelphia, Montgomery, and Bucks counties.
The standout feature here is one-stop service. Most water damage restoration companies wait for a separate plumber to fix the source before they can start cleanup. Roto-Rooter sends its own plumbers and its own restoration crew, so the plumbing repair and the water extraction happen in parallel. Their restoration technicians hold IICRC certification and use air scrubbers, dehumidifiers, and HEPA filtration. For mold work, they follow IICRC and AMRT remediation standards and apply antimicrobial treatments.
The company has operated since 1935 nationally. The Philadelphia branch serves the metro area 24/7, 365 days a year, with no extra charge for nights, weekends, or holidays. They hold PA plumbing license MP: 40499 and home improvement contractor license HIC: PA117264. They bill insurance companies directly and offer Synchrony Bank financing.
4.8 stars across 3,816 Google reviews is a strong number for a high-volume franchise operation. Most plumbing and restoration companies in this review range sit closer to 4.5. The volume reflects how many calls Roto-Rooter handles in Philadelphia, and the rating holds up despite the pricing complaints that come with franchise pricing.
Services
Service area
Headquartered at 3515 Frankford Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19134. The Philadelphia branch covers Philadelphia County plus Montgomery and Bucks counties. Their service area page lists over 100 specific cities and neighborhoods including Abington, Doylestown, Norristown, Levittown, Lansdale, New Hope, and Warminster, stretching from South Philadelphia to Upper Bucks County.
Review consensus
Brian is the standout name in recent Philadelphia reviews — praised repeatedly for being knowledgeable, on time, friendly, and clear in his explanations. He handles everything from kitchen faucets to sewer line work to commercial plumbing. Chalana draws similar praise across a dozen recent reviews for drain cleaning, garbage disposals, and pipe replacements, with reviewers calling out his speed, professionalism, and ability to solve problems other plumbers could not. Scott, James, and Bernard each received strong single mentions. The operational pattern in positive reviews is consistent: fast scheduling (often same-day), clear upfront pricing discussion, and technicians who explain what they find before starting work.
19 found across 3816 total reviews at 4.8★. Pricing dominates. Jamel Lofton describes a technician who spent less than five minutes on-site, diagnosed a $10,000-$15,000 curb trap replacement, and left — a second plumber found a simple blockage and cleared it with hydro jetting. Erika Hertel paid $300 for a service call where technician Sean declared a collapsed pipe after 30 minutes; another plumber cleared the clog quickly and told her Sean just did not work the problem. Julia Monsonego saw her quote jump from $290 to $665 mid-job while four technicians across three visits failed to fix the issue; a local plumber fixed it for $375. Amanda Staples paid $300 for a service call that flooded her kitchen with sewage — the plumber carried no towels, threw sewage water off her porch in freezing weather, and never fixed the frozen pipe. Nitin Mathur was quoted $600 for a faucet install and $1,000 for a toilet replacement; one was fixed with a spanner in 30 seconds. On the scheduling side, Jessica Carrion-Bucha waited two days with repeated promises and no technician ever arrived. Tyler Honschke had a gas leak in freezing weather; the technician ghosted after finding no street parking. Luz Mendez was charged $635 for 15 minutes of work on a Sunday, and customer service rep Chris argued with her and said she was wasting his time. Janice Hayes reports that phone rep Ashley hung up on her when she asked about payment options.
The pricing complaints follow a franchise incentive structure. Multiple reviewers note that technicians work on commission, which may encourage diagnosing expensive repairs over simpler fixes. The two most detailed negative reviews (Jamel Lofton and Erika Hertel) both describe the same pattern: a brief on-site visit, an expensive diagnosis, and a second-opinion plumber who found the real problem was minor. The 100% owner response rate masks the fact that every response is identical template text from Pat Swanson directing customers to email. None address the specific complaint. The one exception is Marsheena Doman, whose review was initially positive and received a cheerful owner reply — but her update describing a botched job and five months of unanswered refund calls went without an updated response.
Brian (plumber — consistently praised across 10+ reviews for knowledge, punctuality, and clear explanations). Chalana (plumber — praised across 10+ reviews for speed, professionalism, and problem-solving). Scott (plumber — praised for friendliness and efficiency). James (plumber — praised for helping first-time homebuyers with kitchen plumbing). Bernard (plumber — praised for emergency leak response at a coffee shop). Mike (plumber — praised for outdoor pipe repair). Taylor (plumber/coordinator — praised by Michael Scott for ensuring insurance coverage before starting work). Bryan (plumber — praised for friendly service by Letty Sanchez). Sean (plumber — negative, Erika Hertel says he did not work the clogged sink problem properly). Chris (customer service — negative, Luz Mendez says he was rude and told her she was wasting his time). Ashley (phone staff — negative, Janice Hayes says she hung up during a payment question). Michael (coordinator — negative, Michael Scott says he refused to provide an itemized bill and copped an attitude). Pat Swanson (Customer Satisfaction Manager — responds to all negative reviews with identical template).
Request Brian or Chalana by name when you book — they account for the overwhelming majority of positive reviews. Get a written estimate before any work starts and ask whether the technician is recommending the cheapest effective fix, not just the most expensive one. If the diagnosis involves a major repair over $1,000, get a second opinion from a local plumber before authorizing the work.
Keep in mind
- Roto-Rooter does both mold testing and mold remediation. When the same company that tests for mold also profits from the remediation work, there is a financial incentive to find problems. Consider getting an independent mold assessment before agreeing to remediation.
- Pricing is the most frequent complaint in recent reviews. Multiple customers report quotes of $600 to $15,000 for work that independent local plumbers completed for a fraction of the cost. At least two reviewers (Jamel Lofton, Erika Hertel) describe technicians diagnosing expensive repairs without meaningful investigation — and second-opinion plumbers resolved the issue with simpler, cheaper fixes.
- All 19 recent negative reviews received responses from the same person, Pat Swanson, Customer Satisfaction Manager. Every response follows the same template: apologize, ask the customer to email with their address and a copy of the review. None engage with the specific complaint. This is reputation management, not problem-solving.
- Several reviewers describe scheduling failures — being promised a technician for days with no one showing up (Jessica Carrion-Bucha), or being ghosted after the technician encountered street parking issues (Tyler Honschke).
- One reviewer (Allison Samson) alleges a technician stole credit card information and made fraudulent charges. The owner response followed the same template as all other complaints. This is an unresolved allegation from a 2-review account, but it is worth noting.