Provider profile
Roto-Rooter Plumbing & Water Cleanup
Provider snapshot
What this listing says
Camden County homeowners dealing with basement flooding or water damage who want plumbing repair and water restoration handled by one company with 24/7 availability.
Best for
- Runnemede and Camden County homeowners who need a burst pipe fixed and the resulting water damage cleaned up in the same call.
- After-hours emergencies where you need someone to answer the phone at 2 AM and show up the same night.
- Homeowners whose insurance company requires detailed documentation, drying logs, and direct-billing coordination.
- Commercial properties in South Jersey that need scalable water extraction and structural drying.
- Basement mold situations caused by water intrusion where the moisture source also needs plumbing repair.
About this company
Roto-Rooter in Runnemede, NJ is a franchise location of the national plumbing and water cleanup chain, operating since 1935. They handle plumbing, drain cleaning, water damage restoration, and mold remediation out of one office at 120 E 9th Ave. The location is managed by Alex Ranton and covers Camden, Burlington, Gloucester, Cumberland, Salem, and Cape May counties. Their plumbing license is held by John Lucchese.
What makes this location different from a standalone mold remediation company is the plumbing-plus-restoration model. When a pipe bursts and causes water damage, they send plumbers to fix the source and a separate restoration crew to extract water, dry the structure, and handle mold if needed. Their mold remediation page mentions HEPA vacuums, air scrubbers, dehumidifiers, and antimicrobial treatments. Their water damage teams carry IICRC certification and follow IICRC drying standards. They bill insurance companies directly and offer financing through Synchrony Bank.
Roto-Rooter has been in business nationally for over 90 years, and this Runnemede branch serves a wide swath of South Jersey. The franchise model means you get name recognition and 24/7 phone coverage, but the technicians and service quality are specific to this local office.
At 4.7 stars across 1,052 Google reviews, the rating is solid for a high-volume franchise operation. The sheer number of reviews reflects the volume of calls a national brand handles. Most customers praise fast response times and friendly technicians, though pricing and diagnostic accuracy surface repeatedly in the negatives.
Services
Service area
Headquartered in Runnemede, NJ. Serves Camden, Burlington, Gloucester, Cumberland, Salem, and Cape May counties. Named communities include Cherry Hill, Collingswood, Haddonfield, Voorhees, Mount Laurel, Marlton, Moorestown, Vineland, Millville, Bridgeton, Woodbury, Glassboro, and Wildwood. The six-county claim covers a large portion of South Jersey, roughly 60 miles from coast to inland border.
Review consensus
Fast response times dominate the positive reviews. Multiple customers mention calling and having a technician arrive within hours, including on holidays and weekends. Named techs praised by name include Bobby for explaining options and putting a customer at ease, Dennis and the water mitigation team for handling a collapsed sewer line emergency, Anthony for going above and beyond on a smart toilet install, George for a fair-priced Sunday water heater repair, John for walking a customer through all potential outcomes, Shawn for persistence in resolving a problem, Lenny for explaining pipework, Ken for answering endless questions patiently, and Kathy on the phone for going out of her way to help. Reviewers consistently mention that techs explain what they are doing, clean up after themselves, and are courteous.
13 found across 1052 total reviews at 4.7★. Pricing disputes appear in at least 6 of 13 one-star reviews. Mark Saavedra paid $150 to tighten a bolt. Andy German was charged $445 for unsuccessful clog work, then quoted $3,500 more, and fixed it himself with a plunger. Fst4 Spd paid $814 for a scope that immediately led to a $6,500 quote with no receipt or paperwork. Marie Riegg paid $900 for a snaking that a second plumber determined was never actually performed. Justin Kekatos paid $1,500 for 15 minutes of scope work that yielded only a $17,000 quote. Diagnostic accuracy is another pattern: arieltorranceful reports a $10,500 quote to replace an outside pipe while a 3-foot crack on the inside pipe was missed entirely. Corban T. (3 stars, later resolved) was charged $900+ for a 10-minute visit and a misdiagnosis that a real plumber fixed for $750. Two reviewers, Emily Aunio and jud4s, describe excavation work where holes were left unfilled for weeks. Tom Jefferson and jud4s both describe high-pressure sales tactics with no camera evidence shown. Donnie C. had a missed appointment with no call. G-Man alleges unnecessary work performed on elderly customers. J R and Christopher Smith left wordless 1-star reviews.
Every single owner response follows the same template: an apology followed by a redirect to Pat Swanson at pat.swanson@rrsc.com. None of the responses engage with the specific facts of the complaint. Two responses claim they cannot find the customer in their system. This is reputation management by script, not case-by-case problem-solving. The one exception is Corban T., whose review edit notes that higher-ups eventually made things right, suggesting the email escalation path does sometimes produce results. The 100% response rate looks attentive at a glance, but the uniformity of the responses undermines that impression.
Bobby (plumber — positive, praised for explanations and empathy). Dennis (water mitigation team — positive, handled sewer line emergency). Anthony (plumber — positive, above and beyond on install). George (plumber — positive, fair-priced Sunday repair). John (service tech — positive, detailed walkthrough of options). Shawn (tech — positive, persistent problem solver). Lenny (plumber — positive, explained pipework). Ken (tech — positive, patient with questions). Kathy (phone support — positive, went out of her way). Rich (tech — positive, called a lifesaver). David (tech — positive, fast fix). Eddie (tech — positive, informative). Gary (tech — positive, kind and knowledgeable). Chris (tech — positive, courteous and knowledgeable). Andrew (plumber — mixed, only helpful tech in Taisha Rivera's multi-visit ordeal but still charged $650 for unsuccessful work).
Roto-Rooter Runnemede works well when you need fast emergency response and a straightforward repair. The franchise handles high volume and most customers leave satisfied. But for anything involving a large quote, especially sewer line replacement or excavation, get a second opinion before signing. Ask to see camera footage, get line-item pricing in writing, and confirm backfill timelines before work begins.
Keep in mind
- Roto-Rooter both tests for mold and performs the remediation. That creates a financial incentive to find problems. Consider getting an independent mold inspection before committing to their remediation work.
- Pricing complaints are the most persistent theme in negative reviews. Multiple customers report being quoted thousands of dollars for work that a second plumber resolved for far less. Get a written estimate and a second opinion before authorizing major repairs.
- Several reviewers describe a pattern where a technician diagnoses a large repair, charges hundreds for the initial visit, and the diagnosis turns out to be wrong when checked by another plumber. Ask to see camera footage or documentation before agreeing to excavation or line replacement.
- Backfill and site cleanup after excavation work has been a recurring complaint. At least two reviewers waited weeks for Roto-Rooter to fill holes left in their yards. Confirm in writing when backfill and restoration will be completed.
- This is a franchise with a six-county service area. The technician who arrives may be great, or may be having an off day. The experience varies more than it would at a small owner-operated company.