Provider profile

Revive Restoration

Plymouth, MN / 4.8 rating / 30 reviews / Water damage restoration service

RR

Provider snapshot

What this listing says

Plymouth and western Twin Cities homeowners dealing with water-triggered mold who want a Wisconsin-rooted restoration company with a dedicated Minnesota office, IICRC mold credentials, and a project manager (ask for Tim B. or Rod) who checks in daily.

In-house rebuild and drywallContainment and air scrubbingCommercial multi-unit work24-hour emergency response
Base location Plymouth, MN
Provider type Restoration company
Public reviews 4.8 from 30 reviews

Best for

  • Plymouth, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, and western Twin Cities homeowners who need mold remediation from a company that runs containment and works with independent post-remediation testing.
  • Homeowners with water damage that has turned into a mold problem, since Revive handles the full sequence from water extraction through drywall rebuild under one roof.
  • Commercial property managers in the Twin Cities who need multi-unit water or mold work, given the company's documented experience with large-scale projects like a 6-floor apartment flood.
  • Buyers who value daily project updates and a named project manager, since reviewers consistently describe check-ins from Rod, Tim, Brian, and Andrea throughout multi-day jobs.

About this company

Revive Restoration operates a Minneapolis-area office out of Plymouth, Minnesota, at the Bass Lake Business Centre on Nathan Lane. Their headquarters is in Madison, Wisconsin, where the company was founded. They handle water damage, fire damage, mold remediation, storm damage, asbestos and biohazard cleanup, duct and carpet cleaning, contents storage, board-up services, and full reconstruction including drywall and paint. Both residential and commercial.

The mold work stands out on their website. They describe three containment levels (source, local, and full-scale) and five remediation principles covering safety, documentation, contamination control, removal, and prevention. They reference working with independent indoor environmental professionals for post-remediation verification and uploading documentation to job management software that clients can access in real time. They use air scrubbers to create negative air pressure, HEPA vacuuming, and industrial-grade dehumidifiers. The site claims ten years of passing post-remediation verifications. They hold IICRC mold remediation credentials, Chuck DeWald Structural Drying Academy training, and EPA Lead-Safe certification.

The company started in Wisconsin and describes Minnesota as an expansion market. The Plymouth office serves Minneapolis, St. Paul, Edina, Minnetonka, Maple Grove, Eden Prairie, and Rogers. The Wisconsin office covers Madison and surrounding cities. Pat Simonett signed the owner response on the one negative review, indicating ownership involvement. The company won an InBusiness 2020 Small Business Award in Wisconsin and uses Xactimate for estimating and DocuSketch for documentation.

4.8 stars across 30 Google reviews for this location is strong. Nearly every review is 5 stars, and the few that are not still rate 4 stars. The review volume is modest but the consistency is notable.

Services

Mold remediationmold testingwater damage restorationsewer backup cleanupwinter and ice dam damagefire damage restorationsmoke damage restorationstorm damage restorationasbestos removalbiohazard cleanuptrauma cleanupduct cleaning

Service area

Based at 5480 Nathan Ln N, Suite 140, Plymouth, Minnesota (Bass Lake Business Centre). Headquarters in Madison, Wisconsin. The Minnesota office serves Plymouth, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Edina, Minnetonka, Maple Grove, Eden Prairie, and Rogers. Tom Trudeau's review mentions the Madison crew driving to Janesville, Wisconsin, within an hour, suggesting crews cross the state line when needed.

Review consensus

What reviewers praise

Tim B. is the most frequently named person in reviews. Vince R (17 reviews, Local Guide) described Tim helping through two separate home issues with industry experience. Paige Carlson praised his response times. Mindy Siegel noted his quick response and follow-up. David Lee (47 reviews, Local Guide) described Tim as having a great work ethic and helping explain smoke and fire remediation. Corey B said Tim and the team handled a sump pump failure and communicated every step. Emma Hext named Sarah and Tim for coordinating a project. Ella Martinson, Jenna Piper, Denise Wood, Sonja Williams, Tim Trainor, and Keri Rudnick all named Tim in their reviews. Rod Israeli appears in multiple reviews as project manager: Sandy Madden described him following up on each job to verify quality, Susan Albert called him a wonderful project manager, Hans Hinke praised his daily check-ins, Beth Ott edited her review to say Rod took great care through the finishing phase, and Rick Corcoran praised Rod's team and work quality. Brian appears across several reviews as a field technician: Tessa De Smidt named Brian as project manager alongside Carson, Hector, and Thadius. Mark Swenson named Brian, Carson, Mike, and Thadius. Joe Weber praised Brian, Devan, and Jorge for speed. Cory in the office drew a specific shout-out from Trisha Vanatta. Andrea was named as project manager by Gayle Goetz. Jesse B. was praised by Tammy for stepping in to fix initial work that did not meet expectations. Logan was named by Ana Flynn as a responsive and organized project manager.

What low reviews reveal

1 found across 30 total reviews at 4.8★. (1 found across 30 total reviews at 4.8★) Nathan Petersen (24 reviews, Local Guide) left a 1-star review in January 2026 describing a pushy salesperson showing up in a van speeding down the street. The review contains no details about the service itself, no named staff, and no description of mold or restoration work. Owner Pat Simonett responded a month later stating they cannot locate any record of Nathan as a client and asked him to call if the review was left in error. This is the only negative review in the last 18 months.

Pattern worth noting

The review base splits into two visible groups: Tim B. dominates the older reviews (late 2024 through early 2026), while Rod Israeli, Brian, Carson, and a larger field crew appear in the more recent reviews (March-May 2026). This may reflect a growing Minnesota operation where Tim handled early sales and project management while the company staffed up with dedicated field crews. Tammy's review is notable because it describes initial work that did not meet expectations before Jesse B. stepped in to make things right. The company's willingness to correct course and Tammy's ultimate 5-star rating suggest they take rework seriously rather than walking away from problems.

Named staff

Tim B. (project manager/sales — positive, named in 10+ reviews for fast response, clear communication, and industry knowledge). Rod Israeli (project manager — positive, named by Sandy Madden, Susan Albert, Hans Hinke, Beth Ott, and Rick Corcoran for quality follow-through and daily check-ins). Brian (project manager/technician — positive, named by Tessa De Smidt, Mark Swenson, Joe Weber, Terry Jjessen, Beth Ott, and Conor McInerny). Carson (technician — positive, named by Tessa De Smidt, Mark Swenson, Terry Jjessen, and Conor McInerny). Thadius (technician — positive, named by Tessa De Smidt, Mark Swenson, and Helen Brown). Mike (technician — positive, named by Mark Swenson, Helen Brown, and Beth Ott). Logan (project manager — positive, named by Ana Flynn). Jesse B. (project manager — positive, named by Tammy for fixing earlier subpar work). Andrea (project manager — positive, named by Gayle Goetz and Marion Wellnitz). Jon (carpenter — positive, named by Gayle Goetz for spotting additional issues). Cory (office staff — positive, named by Trisha Vanatta and Marion Wellnitz for coordination). Sarah (staff — positive, named by Emma Hext). Luis/Luis Gimenez (technician — positive, named by Michael Yang, Jason Sansone, and Trisha Vanatta). Freddy/Freddy Adan (technician — positive, named by Michael Yang and Jason Sansone). Hector (technician — positive, named by Tessa De Smidt and Trisha Vanatta). Julio (technician — positive, named by Jason Sansone). Jose (technician — positive, named by Jason Sansone). Devan (technician — positive, named by Joe Weber). Jorge (technician — positive, named by Joe Weber). Sergio (technician — positive, named by Terry Jjessen). Manny (technician — positive, named by Terry Jjessen). Reese (technician — positive, named by Beth Ott and Marion Wellnitz). Kye (technician — positive, named by Marion Wellnitz). John (technician — positive, named by Mark Crary and Marion Wellnitz). Alex (technician — positive, named by Mark Crary). Gaston (technician — positive, named by Mark Crary). Pat Simonett (owner — signed owner response on negative review).

Bottom line

Ask for Tim B. if you want someone who will explain the process and follow up, or Rod Israeli if your project needs close daily management through reconstruction. The crew roster is large and growing, which means you should confirm who will be on your specific job. Get an independent mold assessment before agreeing to remediation scope, and ask whether your crew dispatches from Plymouth or Madison.

Keep in mind

  • They do both mold testing and mold remediation. The same company that identifies your mold problem can bill to fix it. Their website mentions working with independent indoor environmental professionals for post-remediation verification, but you should request a separate company for the initial mold assessment before agreeing to any remediation scope.
  • This is a Wisconsin-headquartered company with a satellite office in Plymouth. The Madison team has handled work as far as Janesville (per Tom Trudeau's review), which suggests crews may travel between states. Ask whether your crew dispatches from Plymouth or Madison and how that affects response time for non-emergency work.
  • Emergency jobs take priority over scheduled work. Beth Ott's review notes that ETAs shift because emergencies bump non-emergency projects. Build flexibility into your timeline if your job is not urgent.
  • The only negative review (1 star from Nathan Petersen in January 2026) alleges a pushy salesperson arriving in a van. The owner responded that they have no record of this person as a client. With only 30 reviews total, there is limited data to identify complaint patterns.
  • The fans and dehumidifiers used during drying are loud. Beth Ott flagged this as something to plan for, especially with noise-sensitive household members.