Provider profile

Roto-Rooter Plumbing & Water Cleanup

Detroit, MI / 4.5 rating / 1271 reviews / Water damage restoration service

RP

Provider snapshot

What this listing says

Detroit metro homeowners dealing with water damage that led to mold growth, where having one company handle plumbing repair, water extraction, and mold remediation under IICRC standards saves coordinating multiple contractors.

Plumbing + remediation in-house24/7 emergency responseIICRC water restoration
Base location Detroit, MI
Provider type Restoration company
Public reviews 4.5 from 1271 reviews

Best for

  • Detroit metro homeowners whose mold problem started with a plumbing failure -- burst pipe, sewer backup, or basement flooding -- and who want one company to handle the full chain from plumbing repair through mold remediation.
  • Commercial property managers across Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties who need a single vendor for water emergencies and mold work, with insurance documentation handled in-house.
  • Homeowners facing a weekend or holiday water emergency who need same-day response and cannot wait for a mold-only company to schedule a visit days later.
  • Buyers who value the backing of a national brand with structured warranty terms over a smaller local operator, and who plan to get a second quote on any large-scope proposal.

About this company

Roto-Rooter in Detroit is a national franchise location managed by Sam Delli and Bill Hall, operating out of 422 W Congress St. The Detroit branch runs as an independent contractor under the Roto-Rooter brand, which means services, pricing, and guarantees can differ from other Roto-Rooter locations. Their primary identity is plumbing and water damage restoration, with mold remediation offered as part of their water damage service line.

What stands out is the one-company approach. They fix the plumbing problem that caused the water damage, extract the water, dry the structure, and handle mold remediation without handing you off to a subcontractor. Their mold crews use HEPA vacuums, air scrubbers, dehumidifiers, and antimicrobial treatments. They follow IICRC and AMRT standards for mold work and employ their own plumbers to address the moisture source -- a setup most standalone remediation companies cannot match.

Roto-Rooter has operated nationally since 1935. The Detroit location covers a sprawling territory across 12 counties, from Wayne and Oakland to Saginaw and Bay. They run 24/7/365 and carry Michigan plumbing license MP #81-12014 and contractor license #80-03747. Financing through Synchrony Bank is available for larger jobs.

At 4.5 stars across 1,271 Google reviews, the Detroit location sits at the lower end of the range where ratings start to raise questions. The volume is large enough to be meaningful, but the recurring pricing complaints in recent reviews deserve attention before you commit.

Services

Mold remediationwater damage restorationwater extractionstructural dryingdehumidificationHEPA air filtrationantimicrobial treatmentbasement flood cleanupsewage cleanupemergency flood servicedrain cleaningsewer line repair

Service area

Headquartered at 422 W Congress St in Detroit, Michigan. The Detroit location lists coverage across 12 counties: Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Genesee, Saint Clair, Lapeer, Huron, Sanilac, Tuscola, Bay, Midland, and Saginaw. Named communities include Detroit, Hamtramck, Ferndale, Eastpointe, Hazel Park, Grosse Pointe Park, Harper Woods, Highland Park, Grosse Pointe Woods, River Rouge, and dozens more across Metro Detroit. The territory stretches roughly 100 miles from Detroit to Saginaw -- confirm response time for locations outside the immediate metro.

Review consensus

What reviewers praise

Reviewers consistently name individual technicians who explain what they find, describe pricing before starting, and clean up after themselves. Anthony Abdaal drew particular praise as an on-site supervisor who guided a family through a major sewer emergency with clarity. Austin cleared drain lines and left detailed notes on invoices across multiple visits. Eric Smith earned trust from repeat customers for honest assessments and clean work areas. Robert (Red) correctly diagnosed a blockage that a previous company had misidentified. Julian, Matt, Jermel, Neil, and Dave each received individual five-star reviews for punctuality and straightforward communication. The dispatch team, including receptionist Andria, gets credit for scheduling flexibility. Multiple reviewers mention same-day or next-day service, including weekends and evenings.

What low reviews reveal

12 found across 1,271 total reviews at 4.5★. Pricing is the dominant complaint. Katie Adair received a $13,608 quote to dig up and replace sewer pipe; a second contractor cleared the same line for $330 and found no pipe damage. The owner responded by citing camera footage showing broken cast iron, creating a factual dispute the buyer cannot resolve without a third opinion. Cory Newsom paid $1,250 for a straightforward sump pump replacement and itemized the parts at roughly $366 retail. Jazzy J paid $355 for an unsuccessful drain cleanout and felt the company should have offered camera inspection first. Mickayla Cox paid $79 for a service call where the plumber only checked the manufacture date on a water heater. Beth Kacell paid $200 for routine maintenance and says the visit caused a backup, then was quoted $400 more to fix it. Beyond pricing, jerad forster described technician Austin B. making comments about alcohol and playing poker on his phone while waiting for payment. Pauline Smith accused representative Dave Villanue of misleading her about an assignment of benefits document, which she says she was told she did not sign but later discovered she had. Erin Hollerback described a replacement plumber arriving with no knowledge of the previous day's work, then spending time petting her cat instead of completing the job. Lashawn Chaney described the warranty as misleading, covering only a single return visit within six months.

Pattern worth noting

The pricing complaints follow a pattern consistent with franchise service models: technicians arrive fast and handle the immediate problem, but the quoted prices for follow-up or larger-scope work run significantly above market rate. Several reviewers noted the initial service was fine but the upsell or follow-up quote felt predatory. The owner response pattern is mixed -- some responses engage with specifics and provide factual context (Lisa Wilson's response explained the storm vs. sanitary distinction; Katie Adair's cited camera footage), while others default to 'we have no record of you' or request the review be taken down. The 53% response rate on recent negatives suggests selective engagement rather than a consistent reputation management practice.

Named staff

Anthony Abdaal (supervisor -- positive, praised for guiding emergency repairs with confidence and empathy). Austin (technician -- positive across multiple reviews for detailed reporting and clean work; one negative from jerad forster for unprofessional comments about alcohol and playing poker). Austin B. (likely same as Austin -- negative, unprofessional behavior during service call). Eric Smith / Erik Smith (technician -- positive, praised for honesty, clean work areas, and detailed explanations by multiple reviewers). Robert 'Red' (technician -- positive, correctly diagnosed a blockage misidentified by a competitor). Julian (technician -- positive, praised for timeliness and kindness). Matt (technician -- positive, resolved sewer backup and earned repeat business). Matt U. (technician -- positive, went beyond expectations on drain work). Jermel (technician -- positive, outstanding work with detailed explanations). Ryan (technician -- positive, arrived promptly on a Sunday, straightforward on pricing). Neil (technician -- positive, explained work clearly, provided helpful tips). Dave/David (technician -- positive, explained pricing upfront, cleaned up after himself). Dave Villanue (sales representative -- negative, accused of misleading customer about assignment of benefits). Carlos (technician -- positive, efficient and knowledgeable). AJ (technician -- positive, stayed past shift, educated children about drain care). Charlie Campbell (technician -- positive, friendly and honest). Mark (technician -- positive, resolved plumbing issue for long-time customer). Lamar (technician -- positive, patient and explanatory). Chris (technician -- positive, transparent about cost and aftercare). Noah (technician -- positive, solved drain clog). Norm (technician -- positive, evaluated and fixed problem quickly). James Biondo (technician -- positive, handled large pipe and drain replacement job). Andria (receptionist -- positive, accommodating with scheduling). Sam Delli (manager -- listed on website). Bill Hall (manager -- listed on website).

Bottom line

Roto-Rooter Detroit sends knowledgeable technicians who explain their work and clean up after themselves -- the individual service experiences are genuinely strong. The risk is on pricing. Before approving any job over a few hundred dollars, get a written quote with itemized parts and labor, then get a second opinion from a local competitor. Ask for the same tech by name if you had a good experience, since quality varies by who shows up.

Keep in mind

  • Multiple recent reviewers report quotes dramatically higher than what competitors charged for the same work. One reviewer received a $13,608 quote for sewer work that a second contractor completed for $330. Another paid $1,250 for a sump pump replacement involving roughly $366 in parts and an hour of labor. Get at least one competing bid before approving any job over $500.
  • This is a franchise operating as an independent contractor. Pricing, warranties, and service quality at this Detroit location do not necessarily reflect other Roto-Rooter branches. Ask specifically about the Detroit location's warranty terms in writing before work starts.
  • The service territory spans 12 counties from Metro Detroit to Saginaw and Bay City. That is a 100-mile spread. Confirm actual response time to your specific address, especially for emergency calls outside Wayne and Oakland counties.
  • Several negative reviewers reported the owner responded with 'we have no record of you being a customer.' Three of these reviewers share the surname Tyler and posted within a day of each other, which clouds their reliability. But the pattern of owner responses defaulting to 'we can't find you' rather than engaging with specifics is worth noting.
  • Their website lists mold remediation as a subsection of water damage restoration, not a standalone service. If your mold problem is not connected to a recent water event, confirm they will take the job before scheduling.