Provider profile
Tri State Restorations
Provider snapshot
What this listing says
DMV-area homeowners facing water, sewage, or mold emergencies who want a family-owned restoration firm with 24/7 response, IICRC-trained crews, and in-house insurance claims coordination.
Best for
- Homeowners in Montgomery County, Prince George's County, or Northern Virginia dealing with water or sewage emergencies that need same-day response.
- Property managers of multifamily communities in Maryland who need a contractor familiar with the Maryland Tenant Mold Protection Act and IICRC S520 remediation standards.
- Buyers who want one company to handle testing, remediation, and reconstruction so they avoid coordinating multiple contractors.
- Commercial property owners in the DC metro area who need a restoration firm carrying pollution liability insurance for high-risk cleanup.
- Homeowners facing combined water damage and mold who want crews experienced in both mitigation and remediation during the same project.
About this company
Tri State Restorations is a family-owned disaster recovery firm based in Clarksburg, Maryland, serving the DC, Maryland, and Virginia metro area. Mold remediation is one piece of a broader operation that covers water damage, sewage cleanup, fire and smoke restoration, biohazard work, and lead abatement. They do both mold testing and remediation under one roof.
What stands out is their equipment and process specificity. Their mold page describes FLIR infrared thermal imaging cameras and borescopes for hidden moisture detection, containment with negative air pressure using HEPA-filtered air filtration devices, and a multi-step cleaning method they call the "HEPA sandwich" — vacuum, damp wipe, vacuum again. They carry pollution liability insurance, which is unusual for a restoration company and required for certain high-risk cleanup work. They also hold an EPA lead renovator certification for lead abatement and asbestos inspection.
The company has operated since 2007 and claims over 30 years of combined industry experience across ownership. They hold MHIC contractor licenses in Maryland and DC, which means they handle reconstruction after remediation — not just the tearout. They run a Homeowner Hardship Program and offer financing through EnerBank USA. They also run a continuing education series for industry partners, which suggests deep roots in the local restoration network.
4.8 stars across 388 Google reviews is a strong signal for a restoration company at this volume. Most of the praise centers on fast emergency response and individual technicians. The negative reviews cluster around a single issue — billing — which is covered in detail below.
Services
Service area
Headquartered in Clarksburg, Maryland. Primary coverage spans the Washington DC metro area including Montgomery County, Prince George's County, Howard County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Baltimore City, Carroll County, Frederick County, and Washington County in Maryland; Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Arlington County, Alexandria, and Falls Church in Virginia; and Washington DC. The company also lists WV and PA in its coverage area, but reviews and service pages focus on the immediate DMV region.
Review consensus
Alfredo is the most frequently named technician across dozens of reviews, consistently praised for fast response, clear explanations, and careful work during water and sewage emergencies. Daniel Adu and Cirilio C form another frequent team, with reviewers highlighting their courtesy, thoroughness, and willingness to explain each step. Diego pairs often with Alfredo and draws similar praise. Office staff get less attention, but Virginia in accounting earns specific callouts for handling insurance paperwork, and Deon and Eric are praised for coordinating the process. Several reviewers mention 90-minute or same-day response, and multiple reviews note that plumbers specifically recommended Tri State. The overall theme is speed of arrival combined with technicians who communicate well during a stressful situation.
7 found across 388 total reviews at 4.8★. Six of seven recent negative reviews center on billing. PJ M (Local Guide, 15 reviews) described an emergency contract with no clear estimate, followed by a bill their insurance adjuster called heavily inflated. Adrianne Medina (Local Guide, 12 reviews) reported equipment charges at more than double local norms per Xactimate pricing. Lara ChV's $2,500 starting price became $7,500, with line items for services she says were never performed and 14.5 hours of "technician supervision" for a small bathroom. Diana Kiker (2 stars, 1 like) paid $5,000 out of pocket and only received a $500 credit after posting her negative review. Bill Donnelly praised the fieldwork but changed his review to 1-star over the bill. Skyler Karalus said insurance found the charges excessive. The remaining 1-star review from Joseph Gibson simply says "Awful experience" with no specifics — the owner response describes a Saturday consultation and successful mitigation. The owner responds to every negative review. Several responses reference a published price list and emergency agreement, and some point to insurance carrier undervaluation. But the responses follow a consistent template and often redirect blame to the customer's insurance policy rather than addressing specific billing line items.
The billing complaints follow a structural pattern tied to how emergency restoration works: the customer signs a contract during a crisis, the company does the work, and the bill arrives weeks later — often at a much higher amount than expected. The company positions this as an insurance coverage issue, not a pricing issue. But multiple reviewers (including Local Guides with substantial review histories) report that their insurance adjusters specifically flagged Tri State's pricing as above industry norms. The owner responds to 100% of negatives, but the responses are notably formulaic — most include the same link to their pricing page and a similar paragraph about insurance carriers undervaluing claims. At least two customers report that their reviews prompted billing concessions (Diana Kiker got her $500 credit the morning after posting; Lara ChV received a $1,000 reduction offer after posting). This suggests the company monitors reviews actively and uses them as a negotiation trigger.
Alfredo (field technician — overwhelmingly positive across dozens of reviews, also named positively in two reviews that later turned negative over billing). Daniel Adu (field technician — consistently positive, frequently paired with Cirilio). Cirilio C (field technician — consistently positive). Diego (field technician — consistently positive, frequently paired with Alfredo). Artur/Arthur Vaca (field technician — positive). Carlos J (field technician — positive). Deon (project coordinator — positive). Virginia (accounting — positive, praised for insurance coordination). Eric (office/phone — positive). Daryhanna (coordinator — positive, praised for communication). Adrianne (office — positive). Liseth M (field technician — positive). Leo (field technician — positive). Drebo (field technician — positive).
The fieldwork earns genuine praise — Alfredo's crew in particular shows up fast and handles water and sewage emergencies well. The risk is in the billing. Ask for a written not-to-exceed estimate before signing the emergency contract, get your insurance adjuster involved before work begins if possible, and confirm in writing what the final cost will be before equipment gets dropped off. If you go in with clear cost expectations locked down, the operational side of this company delivers.
Keep in mind
- Tri State does both mold testing and remediation. That means the company identifying your mold problem is the same one billing to fix it. Consider getting an independent mold assessment before committing to their remediation scope.
- Billing is the dominant complaint in negative reviews. Multiple customers report final invoices far exceeding initial expectations — in one case, a $2,500 starting price became a $7,500 bill. The company says their emergency agreement includes a link to their price list, but several reviewers say they had no clear estimate before work began.
- Insurance adjusters have flagged their pricing in multiple reviews. Several customers report that their insurance carrier deemed Tri State's charges above industry norms, leaving the homeowner responsible for the difference. The company attributes this to carriers undervaluing claims.
- Their service area claims span MD, DC, VA, WV, and PA. The reviews and most of their service pages focus on the immediate DC metro area. If you are outside Montgomery, Prince George's, Howard, or Fairfax counties, confirm actual response times before committing.
- At least two reviewers changed initially positive reviews to 1-star after receiving their bills. The quality of the fieldwork was not disputed — the issue was cost.