Provider profile

Roto-Rooter Plumbing & Water Cleanup

Newington, CT / 4.8 rating / 180 reviews / Water damage restoration service

RP

Provider snapshot

What this listing says

Newington-area homeowners dealing with water damage that also triggered mold growth, who want one company to handle plumbing repair, water extraction, and mold remediation under a single dispatch.

Water damage + mold24/7 emergency dispatchInsurance claim filing
Base location Newington, CT
Provider type Restoration company
Public reviews 4.8 from 180 reviews

Best for

  • Newington and greater Hartford County homeowners who discover mold after a basement flood, sewer backup, or pipe failure and want the plumbing fix and mold cleanup handled by one crew.
  • Homeowners who need emergency water extraction at 2 a.m. on a holiday — they dispatch around the clock with no overtime surcharge.
  • Insurance-claim situations where you want the company to document damage and coordinate directly with your carrier. Fernando and the mitigation team handle this regularly.
  • Commercial properties in the Hartford metro that need water damage and mold work done quickly to minimize downtime.

About this company

Roto-Rooter in Newington is the local franchise of the national plumbing and water cleanup chain, operating out of 127 Fenn Rd, Suite 121F. Their Newington office, managed by Brian Kix, covers central and eastern Connecticut from Hartford to the UConn corridor. Mold remediation is one piece of a broader service menu that starts with plumbing and extends through water damage restoration.

What makes this location relevant for mold work is the pipeline from plumbing failure to water damage to mold. When a sewer backs up or a pipe bursts, the same company can fix the plumbing source, extract the water, dry the structure, and remediate any mold that follows. Their website describes containment, antimicrobial treatment, and post-remediation assessment. They staff IICRC-certified water restoration technicians and use dehumidifiers and air movers for structural drying.

Roto-Rooter has operated nationally since 1935. The Newington location serves both residential and commercial properties and runs 24/7 with no extra charge for nights, weekends, or holidays. They offer financing through Synchrony Bank and hold a BBB A+ rating. Plumbing license is held by Raymond Quintero (0288452-P1).

4.8 stars across 180 Google reviews is a strong number for a franchise operation handling high-volume emergency calls. The rating holds despite a steady stream of pricing complaints, which suggests the majority of customers are satisfied with the work itself even when they find the bill steep.

Services

Mold remediationmold testingwater damage restorationwater extractionstructural dryingdehumidificationantimicrobial treatmentsewage cleanupbasement flood cleanupemergency flood servicedrain cleaningsewer line repair

Service area

Headquartered in Newington, CT. Serves the greater Hartford County area including Hartford, East Hartford, Wethersfield, Rocky Hill, Glastonbury, South Windsor, Bloomfield, Enfield, Suffield, Canton, Simsbury, Southington, Plainville, Vernon, Coventry, Ellington, Stafford, Willimantic, and Storrs. Claims coverage across 8 Connecticut counties (Hartford, New Haven, Middlesex, Fairfield, Litchfield, Windham, Tolland, New London) — that is an unusually broad footprint for a single office, so confirm availability at your specific address.

Review consensus

What reviewers praise

Fernando is the standout name. He appears in over 15 positive reviews spanning February through June 2026, consistently praised for responding quickly, explaining water damage and mold situations clearly, and helping homeowners file insurance claims. Multiple reviewers say they would give him "100 stars." Manuel draws repeated praise for drain and plumbing work — reviewers highlight that he cleans up after himself and explains what caused the problem. Dazhaun received two 5-star mentions for water heater work and general plumbing skill. Richard, Josh, Orlando, Edward, Franco, Rodney, Sean, and Muharem each receive individual positive mentions. Response speed is a recurring theme — multiple reviewers report technicians arriving within 45 minutes to an hour.

What low reviews reveal

4 found across 180 total reviews at 4.8★. Brenda called for a clogged pipe and says Oliver spent 45 minutes repairing his own equipment in her basement, charged $250 without clearing the clog, then recommended a $2,100 jetter service. When she called to complain, she says Maria in the office was dismissive. A camera technician later recommended $8,500 in pipe work; a competitor jetted the pipe for $1,100. Beth Piantedosi, a Local Guide with 22 reviews, describes being overcharged for a sewer cleanout and upsold an $1,800 water filtration system that she says made her water worse. She reports repeated no-call/no-shows when trying to get it fixed. R McCarthy paid $610 for a Thanksgiving Day drain clearing and called the pricing "grossly overpriced." Pat Brazel left a 1-star rating with no text — the owner responded thanking them for a "5-star rating," suggesting the review may have been modified after the response.

Pattern worth noting

Pricing complaints cut across star ratings. Even 5-star reviewers mention being surprised by costs — one praised Manuel's drain work but noted the quote "will knock the wind out of you," and a Thanksgiving water heater replacement cost $3,600. The 2-star and 3-star reviews reinforce this: $923 for drain clearing with wall damage, $665 for a kitchen sink unclog, $286 for diagnostics. This is consistent with a national franchise model where corporate sets pricing above local market rates. The owner response pattern is notably uniform — Pat Swanson sends the same template to every negative review regardless of the complaint, directing customers to email a corporate address. No response addresses the specific issue raised or offers a concrete resolution.

Named staff

Fernando (water damage/mitigation technician — overwhelmingly positive, praised for insurance claim help and responsiveness). Manuel (plumber/drain technician — positive, praised for drain work and cleanup). Oliver/Oliwer (technician — mixed; one negative review describes equipment failure and incomplete work, one positive review praises knowledge). Maria (office staff — negative, described as dismissive). Dazhaun (technician — positive, praised for water heater work). Richard (technician — positive). Josh (technician — positive). Orlando (technician — positive, praised for fast diagnosis). Edward (technician — positive). Franco (technician — positive, insurance claim assistance). Rodney (technician — positive, water cleanup). Sean (technician — positive, water cleanup). Muharem (technician — positive). Merg (technician — positive, worked alongside Fernando).

Bottom line

Ask for Fernando if your situation involves water damage or mold — he has a long track record of positive reviews for exactly that work. Get a written quote before any technician starts, and compare it with at least one local competitor, because pricing is the one consistent weak spot across all star levels. If the scope expands during a visit — from drain clearing to camera inspection to pipe replacement — pause and get a second opinion before authorizing additional work.

Keep in mind

  • Roto-Rooter does both mold testing and mold remediation. A company that identifies a mold problem and then sells the fix has a financial incentive to find problems. Consider getting an independent mold assessment before committing to their remediation scope.
  • Pricing is the most consistent complaint in recent reviews. Customers report charges of $600-$923 for drain clearing, $286 for a diagnostics visit, and quotes of $5,000-$8,500 for pipe work. Multiple reviewers who gave 5 stars still noted sticker shock. Get a written estimate before work begins and compare with at least one other company.
  • One reviewer described feeling pressured to make fast decisions about costly mold remediation and said the team immediately started talking about insurance claims. Ask for time to review any remediation proposal before signing.
  • Owner responses to negative reviews follow a rigid template — every reply directs the customer to email Pat Swanson at a corporate address. None of the responses engage with the specific complaint or offer a concrete resolution.